that I'd also already added the quotation to the entry for the lemma at dioecēsis. That entry's such a stubby thing that, surely, the quotation does some good by adding information, and at the very least certainly does no harm also, n.b. Thanks - Μετάknowledge discuss/ deeds 23:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC) Forgive my boldness, but I've reverted your removal of the quotation. We usually put quotes that use inflected forms on the entry for the lemma form. I'm so meta even this acronym ( talk) 16:18, 21 March 2013 (UTC) dioecesim The template produces a simple link to はんしんろん in this case.
There was a debate over having complete definitions, abbreviated definitions, or none at all, but we went for option C, no definitions. Μετάknowledge discuss/ deeds 01:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC) What he/she said. It ought to use the and are basically soft redirects. How about a qualifier like "(pseudo-Classical)"? I'm so meta even this acronym ( talk) 21:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC) Like this? I'm so meta even this acronym ( talk) 22:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC) Possibly. I usually don't add pronunciations to New Latin terms because of that. New Latin pronunciation differs enormously by country. How do I do that? Does it have a different New Latin pronunciation? I'm so meta even this acronym ( talk) 21:32, 25 August 2012 (UTC) That's the problem. EncycloPetey ( talk) 21:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC) OK, sorry. If you do this, you need to mark the pronunciations as modern pronunciations based on Classical principles. You are inventing Classical pronunciations for a word that did not exist in Classical Latin. I'm so meta even this acronym ( talk) 16:00, 6 July 2012 (UTC) suffrutex I took it to mean something like "true", formed from veri- (as in "verity" and "verisimilitude") + -some (as in "worrisome" and "flavoursome"), but I think you may be right that it's just "verisame" with a typo Buckminster Fuller uses "verisame" (see Citations:verisame), which supports your interpretation. Probably just running together "very same" (meaning something like "exact") ? SemperBlotto ( talk) 15:39, 6 July 2012 (UTC) Hmm, yes that makes a lot of sense. Anyway, it's great to have you here! - Μετάknowledge discuss/ deeds 02:08, (UTC) verisome In this case, I find it somewhat humorous on another level, because I'm willing to bet that if you stick around, somebody will confuse us, or even accuse me of sockpuppeteering. :-( I'm so meta even this acronym ( talk) 23:07, (UTC) Having read every xkcd comic, including the hidden ones, I certainly recognized the reference. I would have taken the handle User:ISMETA, but someone somewhere'd already taken User:Ismeta, so the system wouldn't let me. I'm so meta even this acronym ( talk) 21:29, (UTC) Nice username! - Μετάknowledge discuss/ deeds 13:22, (UTC) Thanks, but I can't take the credit for it I took it from xkcd 917. I'll get back to you once I've had time to look it over. SemperBlotto ( talk) 21:23, (UTC) That looks like a lot to take in. What are your criteria for inclusion? I'm so meta even this acronym ( talk) 21:21, (UTC) See Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion. SemperBlotto ( talk) 17:11, (UTC) Yeah, I figured it was an allusion to Plato's Allegory of the Cave. However, see w:Allegory of the Cave for background. Not sure if it would meet our criteria for inclusion.
103 You just deleted my user talk page!.99 Thanks for deleting all those templates.
0 kommentar(er)
